-
Recent Posts
Share
-
Contact Us
Following is a list of co-ordinators & volunteers for Ahmedabad alongwith their contact
information.
| Name | Conatct Number |
|---|---|
| Raj Ahir | 9277752226 |
If you are interested in helping organize this event, contact on 9277752226 or
leave a message.
You can also send your queries to
info@iacahmedabad.org
61 Responses to Contact Us
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Jai hind jai hind jai hind
Desh mangta hai kurwania
Hi all my Gujarati brothers & sisters,
To share with you an important news, that The Gujarat State Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation ( A government firm) is a fraud corporation established by Congress in year 1962. This firm has given loans to almost 6000 cooperative society builders by a false representation as Cooperative loan ( Against security of share capital and liquis assets of society) in reality this organisation has fraudlently mortgaed all cooperative housing socities without consent or power of attorneys. This the biggest fraud by Government of Gujarat. Recently BJP government has registered encrumbrances on property cards of the Cooperative Housing Societies. Please spread the word to general public, that not to give any money for property registration , mortgage release, or anything to this organisation. Congress has done fraud, BJP does Forgery. That’s what our politicle parties are up to (Criminals.
ANNA i support your decision to join politics.This is most corrective steps by you.I and my family support.
As i feel one can’t clean a dirty drain without getting own feet dirty.
Bhopal
To
The Chief Election Commissioner,
Government of India
New Delhi
Sir,
I, Dr. A.B. Bhalerao, Retired Principal of Government Colleges of Madhya Pradesh and a senior citizen of India, congratulate you and your team for your great work to improve the quality of election process.
Indian public, in general, appreciated the efforts made by election commission to improve the election process by which capable and dynamic members of political parties can be elected to carry on the rapid progress of India to match with the developed world.
The government, after election is the fruit of election process and voters are the harvesters of this fruit. So the fruit will be best when the harvesters (voters) have the best knowledge about the candidate and party to whom they are going to elect for the next five years to come.
I have seen a number of elections after independence and have observed the way the political parties campaign during elections. Therefore, I would like to give some suggestions for further improvement in the election process, which are as follows:-
(1) The election campaigns that I observed so far are nothing but unnecessary defaming and throwing mud on each other. This is not at all constructive and will not take India to become a developed country. This type of campaign may be allowed to be carried out only up to three weeks before the date of election.
(2) The voters have right to know the nation building and development plans of different political parties on the basis of which voters can use their valuable votes. So from three weeks before the elections till the date on which campaigning ceases before the election date, all political parties should put before the voters, their year wise nation building and development plans for the next five years. Along with these plans the political parties should submit the budget allocation made for each of their plans. The year wise development plans should be submitted to the election commission three weeks before the date of election.
(3) Those who were in power during the last tenure should tell public the promises they had made about their plans and which plans they have successfully implemented and to what extent they have succeeded. They should also mention those constructive nation building plans which they could not implement completely and the reasons for their failure, so that public can know their efficiency and sincerity and can vote accordingly.
The election commission should publish the plans of all political parties including those who were not in power, in the national newspapers.
A voter has right to information by the constitution of India to know about the plans of different political parties and their capacity to work. Therefore it is the duty of the government and election commission to publish the above said information of all political parties in the national newspapers and allow the parties to broadcast them on radio and telecast on the television.
The voter has only one chance in 5 years to elect the government by using his vote. So this information will help him to elect the proper government and to contribute to the development of the country.
(4)Voting should be made compulsory for all citizens.
(5) The parties spend their own funds for campaigning and hence when they are elected they see their position as an opportunity to make money by corruption. It is like marketing a product or service and one has to market to a greater extent to make his name and gain popularity and this becomes a business for him.
Instead the means should be fixed for campaigning, addressing the public, disclosing agendas through government owned media sources like newspapers, journals, news channels, websites, announcements etc. The number of banners, posters, pamphlets should be fixed and the contracts should be given to government owned agencies and no private business should be entertained.
A candidate should not win the election by increasing the means. Instead fixed means should be given to all parties and within that they should convey their message. This should be the test for best candidate as, after winning the election he has to serve the state through fixed means and hence its best utilization can be done by the best deserving candidate.
After winning the election the representative will never pump his private money in running the state affairs. So, why he should be allowed to use his private power for campaigning?
(6) Last but not the least, provision should be made so that voters should be able to vote for their candidate directly just like the democracy of USA.
The mechanism for the implementation of these suggestions for electoral reform could be established for the constructive politics in this country.
I hope that my suggestions will be taken into consideration. It will be kind of you, if you intimate me accordingly.
Sincerely
Thanking you in anticipation,
A.B. Bhalerao (Retired Principal)
Government Colleges of Madhya Pradesh,
F-128, Gautam Nagar, Govindpura
Bhopal {M.P.}-462023
Copy to: –
Supreme Court, New Delhi
1.Honorable President of India
2.Chief justice of India
i am alwaise with u?
jai hind
i realy have to say we need a new party who atleast look after our feelings our problems and our needs.
i think frm so much yrss= only few parties are commanding our india and we have to give chance to someone new comer. and we defntly give one chance to yr party. because hamare liye abhi dono side khai hai aur samne ek asha ki kiran….. so get up we are wih you……
sir, please enter into the politics, there is no other way to change our system. we are with you ,politically financially
Respected Annaji and the valuable Team,
Thank you ever so much for all that you have been doing for the country for these few years.
God Bless You and your team. My prayers are with you always and I sincerely mean it!
Please come into Rajneeti so that the corrupted politicians comes to know their value in front of the public of this country. We know you will make it a better India ones you come into politicis.
Bharat Mata Ke Jai!
Jai HInd Jai Bharat!
RESPECTED ANNAJI,
I AM ALWAYS WITH YOU. I AM VERY THANKFUL FOR YOUR IAC MOVEMENT. FOR ANY MY SERVICE IN THIS MOVEMENT PLZ ORDER ME ANY TIME. MY MOB. NO. 09457715274.
Arvind Ji hum jante hain aap Jo sangarsh kar rahe hai wo hamari aaney wali genration ke liye kar rahe hai is liye hum aap ke saath hain
aana nilang vilage support
It is sad for our country that people pay little attention, leaving full trust on our politicians when they form law or resolution. We have to pay price today with such revolutionary movement for our enactment only.
m from ahmedabad so plz give me aa adresss in ahmedabad program place
This movement must turn into political movement. Political movement by Annaji will gift us productive actions and quick fruitful results. Sysytem could be changed by entering the system.
arvind kejriwali ji i am student of agriculture from past 4 year i survey many village voluntary and i concluded that there is less awareness to farmer about issue i try to convince them .
kejriwalji multinational companies earning cored rupees from farmer by selling variety which is multiplied(produce farmer only grading and packing doing by companies)and farmer product purchase less than minimum price by savrar(trader).There is need to your support.
i support your mission
brastachar ke khilaf agar ladna hai.to hume khud imandari se prayatna karana padega.
in rajnetao ke bharose to desh ka patanahi kaya hoga.jo desh hit se badkar apane hito ki parwa karte hai.agar hum sab milkar ye than le ki hum kewal usi umidwar ko vote dege jo imandar aur bedag ho.chahe wo nirdliye ho to majboor hokar political parties ko bhi aise hi umidwar ko tikit dena padega jo imandar aur swaksh chavi wala hog
I am dharmendra and i want to say something to the people of gujarat and people of india against “FIX PAY RULE FOR 5 YEARS & CONTRACTUAL JOB OF 11 MONTHS”.
In gujarat, state government recruit youths with a fix pay of 5 years & contractual job for 11 months. salary is very low for these job. when a NGO file PLI against the policy of state government, the state government says that they don’t have enough fund/money for full salary given to youth of gujarat and it will burden for state treasury while in other side, state government announce crores and crores of ruppees packages for different automobiles companies.
CRORES RUPPEES OF PACKAGES FOR BIG AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES ARE NOT BURDEN FOR STATE TREASURY AND SALARY IS A BURDEN FOR STATE GOVERNMENT ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Pleas organize some events and publicity of this matter in gujarat and in india and please convey my message to our honourable leader ANNA HAZARE.
I am totally in support of this “Andolan Against Bhrashtachar”. If we all want a corruption free India then we all have to support this andolan and also should have faith in this campaign,not only in Anna Hazare but in this cause. I also liked the thought “Main Anna Hoon” because we are not blindly following “Anna” but we are himself “Anna” cause we believe in corruption free India.
All for one, one for all.
Jai Hind
I can say one man know leading our country ….
One man who showing Duties of other peoples and our too…
He is not any politician or any Professional or NOT belongs from any party but he belongs from us…
So he is the Right person who can understand our problem and we have to support him …
Annaji, what ever you are doing that every bodies duty and every body should have to take action like you for our own county…
I am indian so i had taken my step BY SUPPORTING YOUR JANLOKBAL BILL ANDOLAN….
Have u did any thing for your country i m doing here and supporting to Anna’s Janlokbal bill….
I think it is every bodies duty to keep his or her own country clean from currupted people..
So support Annaji and …
VANDE MAATRAM………
JAI HIND AND JAY BHARAT…..
While we attempt for Lokpal, see what they have done of Lokayukta in Gujarat
Ahmedabad, 29 August, 2011
Following is a news story from http://Dailypioneer.Com authored by Shri Rathin Das
Former Justice BJ Sethna, who had resigned from high court following false allegations against him few years ago, has not only questioned the process leading to the controversial appointment but also hinted that Mehta is not as much a man of ‘integrity’ as he is touted to be by the State Congress leaders.
Sethna on Saturday said under provisions of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, it is the State Government which has to begin the process of naming the incumbent for the post.
Addressing a seminar on judicial accountability organized by the Gujarat chapter of the Indian Association of Lawyers (IAL), Sethna agreed that the Governor should appoint the Lokayukta in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition but said the process of recommendation of the names must begin from the Council of Ministers led by the Chief Minister.
Sethna questioned why the Opposition and the Chief Justice should insist only on one name and ignore other names short listed by the Council of Ministers.
The Chief Minister had sent a list of four names for consideration to the Chief Justice, said Sethna and asked why only one name was recommended to the Governor for appointment as the Lokayukta. “And why should the Opposition leader too insist on only one name?” asked Sethna.
He hinted that the Opposition is insisting on Mehta’s name because of his old Congress connections.
Sethna said Mehta, before being elevated as a judge in 1983, was a junior to veteran lawyer KK Vekhariya who is now the chief of the Congress legal cell in Gujarat.
Revealing the ‘other side’of the Lokayukta designate, Justice Sethna questioned Mehta’s moral authority to hold the position merely because anti-corruption crusader Anna Hazare had stayed with him during his visit here in May this year, a point projected by the state Congress as one of his ‘qualification’ for the high post.
Drawing parallel from Ramayana, Sethna said Mehta had done to his lawyer friend what Ravana had done to Ram. Mehta had an extra-marital affair for years with the wife of his lawyer friend and the duo finally got married only few years back, according to Sethna.
“How can a person of such ‘moral attitude’ be appointed to a high post like Lokayukta. He may not be corrupt for money, but what about moral behaviour?” asked Sethna.
There is something fishy about naming Justice Mehta for the post, he said and asked why only his name was recommended while there as many as 40 retired honourable High Court judges are available in Gujarat.
Sethna said that the Congress had rejected the name of former Justice KR Vyas as the Lokayukta between 2006 and 2009, but the same person was chosen as the Lokayukta in neighbouring Maharashtra.
“How can the retired judge unfit to be Lokayukta in Gujarat be fit enough for the same post in Congress-NCP ruled Maharashtra?” asked Sethna hinting that political mud slinging is dividing the legal fraternity.
He also pointed out that the Congress has found fault with the appointment of retired Supreme Court Justice MB Shah too to look into the 17 charges against the Gujarat Government under Chief Minister Narendra Modi. “The Congress leaders have forgotten that Justice Shah has an impeccable track record and has been chosen by the Supreme Court for the panel to track black money”, Justice Sethna said adding that it was wrong to call him a ‘puppet’of the Gujarat Government.
Recounting the hue and cry over his judgement upholding the acquittal of the 21 accused in the infamous Best Bakery case of Vadodara, Sethna said he was finally proved correct when the prime witness turned hostile and went back on her words several times.
All of Gujarat’s judiciary was criticised, he lamented and said that finally all realised that Zahira cannot be relied upon as witness and she was punished. Sethna said the judiciary reserves its ruling on many vital matters for long but speedily entertains any NGO filing petitions against Gujarat.
Gandhinagar, 29 August, 2011
Following is the state information department release on facts related to the entire Lokayukta controversy in the state. While it is fact that Gujarat had no Lokayukta for last 7.5 years, the details given below throw light on who was responsible for that – then Governor and the leader of opposition can not escape from being responsible for the delay.
Unconstitutional appointment of Lokayukta in Gujarat
Chronology of dates and events
S. No. Date Events
7.8.2006 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting with the Leader of Opposition in the Gujarat Legislative Assembly, to consult him on the subject of appointment of a suitable person as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
Hon’ble Chief Minister had suggested the name of Justice (Retired) Shri Kshitij R. Vyas and the Leader of Opposition suggested some other names. At the end of discussions, Hon’ble Chief Minister asked whether the Leader of Opposition had any specific objection against the name suggested by him. The Leader of Opposition specifically mentioned that he had no objection to the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister but he wanted that the names suggested by him should also be taken into consideration.
7.8.2006 A letter was sent to Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court as a part of consultation process to know his views on the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
8.8.2006 Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court conveyed his consent to the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
10.8.2006 The file was sent to H.E. the Governor for appointment of Justice (Retired) Shri Kshitij R. Vyas as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
25.8.2006 H.E. the Governor desired that a copy of the minutes/ record of proceedings of the meeting held with the Leader of Opposition by the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 7.8.2006 may be furnished.
13.9.2006 A letter was received from the Raj Bhavan wherein, it was mentioned that H.E. the Governor desired to know the procedure adopted to fulfill the requirement of consultation with the Leader of Opposition and Hon’ble Chief Justice, etc. in the different States like Maharashtra, West Bengal, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and Tamil Nadu.
27.2.2007 The information as called for by H.E. the Governor vide his letter dated 13.9.2006 was sent. Such information was to be obtained from different States and hence it took some time in gathering the information.
6.2.2009 H.E. the Governor returned the file with some observations.
2.7.2009 The file was resubmitted to H.E. the Governor explaining as to how the provisions of section 24(3) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 do not come in the way of appointment of the person suggested by the Government for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
10. 10.9.2009 H.E. the Governor returned the file with the following observation:
“In view of sub-section (3) of section 6 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, since the person recommended by the Government has held the office of the Chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Maharashtra, the Government’s proposal for his appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State cannot be agreed to.”
11. 10.9.2009 The then H.E. the Governor sent a letter to Hon’ble Chief Minister mentioning that it was not possible to appoint Shri Kshitij R. Vyas as Lokayukta, Gujarat State in view of the clear provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
He also requested the Chief Minister to send a fresh proposal for appointment of Lokayukta after due consultation with the Chief Justice of the Gujarat high Court and the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly as per the provisions of section 3(1) of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986.
12. 8.2.2010 A confidential letter was sent by Hon’ble Chief Minister to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court requesting him to suggest a panel of three Retired Judges of the High Court of Gujarat as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
13. 24.2.2010 Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent the panel of four Retired Judges of High Court of Gujarat for consideration for appointment of Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
14. 2.3.2010 A letter was sent by Hon’ble Chief Minister to the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly to participate in the meeting at 11 am on 4.3.2010 as a part of consultation process for appointment of Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
15. 3.3.2010 The Leader of Opposition objected to such process of consultation being initiated by the Hon’ble Chief Minister. He also refused to join the consultation process with Hon’ble Chief Minister.
16. 3.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Leader of Opposition explaining the legal and Constitutional position obtaining in the matter and once again requested to remain present in the meeting of 4.3.2010.
17. 3.3.2010 A confidential letter dated 3.3.2010 was received from H.E. the Governor, wherein she inter alia mentioned that she had deemed it appropriate to initiate the matter of appointment of Lokayukta and had decided to hold consultation with the Leader of Opposition on 4.3.2010 at 10.30 a.m. in her office in Raj Bhavan, Gandhinagar.
18. 4.3.2010 The Leader of Opposition sent a letter saying that in the matter of appointment of a Lokayukta, the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers should not have any say. He also requested the Hon’ble Chief Minister to forthwith terminate the process of consultation initiated by him in the matter.
The Leader of Opposition also informed that H.E. the Governor had already initiated the process of consultation with the Leader of Opposition and a meeting for the purpose was to take place at 10.30 a.m. on 4.3.2010.
19. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Leader of Opposition once again requesting him to participate in the consultation process and to remain present in the meeting at 1 pm on 5.3.2010.
20. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to H.E. the Governor wherein, he mentioned that since certain legal and Constitutional issues have been raised in her letter dated 3.3.2010, he considers it necessary to have a discussion on the subject with her. Hon’ble Chief Minister sought suitable date and time for such discussion/ meeting with H.E. the Governor.
21. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting as per the schedule at 11 am on 4.3.2010 as a part of consultation process. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present in the meeting.
22. 5.3.2010 A letter dated 4.3.2010 was received from the Leader of Opposition intimating that he had already participated in the consultation process at 10.30 am on 4.3.2010 with H.E. the Governor of Gujarat and in view of the consultation already held by H.E. the Governor of Gujarat, he regretted his inability and unwillingness to be present in the meeting to be held by Hon’ble Chief Minister at 1 pm on 5.3.2010.
23. 5.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting as per the schedule at 1 pm on 5.3.2010. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present.
24. 5.3.2010 A letter was received from the Principal Secretary to H.E. the Governor conveying that H.E. the Governor had given the time for the meeting with Hon’ble Chief Minister at 16.00 hrs. on 8.3.2010.
25. 8.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister along with the Hon’ble MoS (Law) called on H.E. the Governor and discussed the point at issue at length. Hon’ble Chief Minister also gave a folder containing all the relevant details pertaining to the issue and requested to resolve the issue at the earliest.
26. 18.3.2010 With a view to ensuring that the consultation process with the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly takes place, Hon’ble Chief Minister sent one more letter to the Leader of Opposition intimating him that he (Hon’ble CM) proposed to hold meeting for consultation process at 11 am on 22.3.2010 (Monday). He also inter alia made it clear that it was for the last time that he was making a request to attend the meeting for consultation process in the matter. Hon’ble Chief Minister had also quoted all the relevant judgments of High Courts/ Supreme Court including the relevant and operative portion to emphasize the factual, legal and constitutional position obtaining in the matter.
27. 22.3.2010 A letter dated 22.3.2010 received from the Leader of Opposition wherein, he inter aliamentioned that he had already been called for the consultation process by H.E. the Governor on 4.3.2010; the said process was already over; there can never be consultation twice: once by Her Excellency the Governor and second by the Chief Minister and/ or the Council of Ministers.
At the end of the letter, the Leader of Opposition mentioned that Hon’ble Chief Minister should not persist in undertaking an exercise of consultation by him which lacks legal, moral and constitutional authority.
28. 22.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held the meeting as per the schedule at 11 am on 22.3.2010 in his office in Vidhan Sabha Complex. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present.
29. 31.3.2010 The name which was decided by the Hon’ble Chief Minister was placed before the Council of Ministers in the meeting of 31.3.2010. The Council of Ministers gave approval to the name.
30. 1.4.2010 The name which was approved by the Hon’ble Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers was sent to H.E. the Governor for obtaining approval.
31. 5.5.2010 The file was returned by H.E. the Governor with the observation that in terms of the recent judgment of the Apex court, the Chief Justice of the High Court is not required to send a panel of the names but he has to send only one name. Accordingly, H.E. the Governor has referred the whole matter back to the Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court requesting him to re-examine the matter once again.
32. 31.12.2010 The Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent the fresh proposal to the State Government recommending only one name for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
33. 21.2.2011 The Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat high Court explaining as to how the process of appointment of Lokayukta could be expedited by appointing the person whose name was recommended earlier by the Government to H.E. the Governor instead of considering a new name.
34. 22.3.2011 The Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent a letter to Hon’ble Chief Minister saying that he would again request the Government to consider the name recommended by him vide his letter dated 31.12.2010.
35. 1.5.2011 The person whose name was recommended by the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court vide his letter dated 31.12.2010 sent a Fax Message to H.E. the Governor requesting her to recall his nomination.
36. 4.5.2011 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court requesting him to recommend the name of the person in whose case the whole process of consideration had been gone through by the State Government for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State. The matter is pending with the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court.
37. 7.6.2011 The Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court recommended another name.
38. 16.6.2011 Hon’ble Chief Minister wrote to the Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court quoting detailed reasons as to why the name recommended by the CJ was not acceptable.
39. 2.8.2011 Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court has sent a letter which was received by the State Government and the State Government, in turn, has addressed a letter dated 18.8.2011 to the Chief Justice reiterating its earlier stand and this letter is still under consideration of the Chief Justice.
40. 25.8.2011 Despite the aforesaid developments, to the utter shock and surprise of the State Government, the H.E. the Governor issued the warrant dated 25.8.2011 appointing Justice (Retd.) Mr. R. A. Mehta as Lokayukta, Gujarat State, the copy of which has been received along with a letter dated 25.8.2011 addressed to the Principal Secretary to the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 26.8.2011
hi, all memembers.
Sir, i am new to ur comitee, but i always very impressed with ur andolan.
Sir i want to tell u something. I am working in medical store since 15 years.i know very well what & how is currption is going on in medical line. I want to raise voice against it with ur support. Pls tell me how ican give information to u about it.pls dont disclose my identity.
Long live india without currption
I m being an Ahir of Kutch, Very Proud of Anna’s Real touch movement, I m being Retired From Central Reserve Police Force and Kept my motivation upto the level to fight against militants in kashmir for 09 yrs, now i after my voluntarily Retirement I Strongly feel that Corruption in the Country is dangerous in comparing to militancy. as militants kills fewer whereas curruption touched allmost all the countryman in any way. I extend my full sport till my death to this movement
I am Live in Ahmedabad.
I want to join this group.
so please tell me how can i join this group?
namskar
rajsthan.me jalore.dist.me.rahe wale hu.
annaji se bat.karni
bhabutrajguru
Here is # of “Anti Corruption Bureau”. Let people call them for their problem.
Spread this number as much you can.
http://www.acb.gujarat.gov.in/acb/CMS.aspx?content_id=3146
Yesterday in RS Mr Sanghvi spoken indirectely what the politicians are. he objected that lokpal can have powers to enquire, to investigate, to procicute etc. he said that will make their power shorter than lokpal.
politicians are fearing that if strong lokpal is implemented they will be in jail.
Parliament is supreme but our politicians are not upto the level of the dignity of the paalament.
me bhi aapke sath hu. muje bhi acha kam karne me bhut aage badhta hu. and me bhavnagar city me shishuvihar org. ke sath kam karta hu ye org. bhi bhut acha kam karti he aur sab kuch such karti hai. and ye sanstha garibo ke liye bahut help karti hai aur eye camp, bacho k liye eye camp, scout activity, school ke garib baccho ko shoes, lunch box etc free me deti hai aaur help karti hai aur usme me bhi joint hu aur aapke sath me kam karna chata hu so muje b aap ke sathe milaye…
Thank u very much
me aapke sath hu… my contact no.09925962182
Gaurav Rathod
Bhavnagar- gujarat
Dear All,
Good luck for great revolution starting from 27 Dec 2011
Some body can guide where we can find Anna T shirt (for men and women) and Anna Topi in Ahmedabad.
Thank you
Please respond.
My Mobile number is 7600865192
I want to ask question to current Govt.( Soniya ji & Manmohan singh) If you support to Lockpal and u favour in indian public , Why not support to Anna ji because you want to support to public and same Anna want to support to public both Aim’s are same , Why not pass to lockpal bill ? Why not agree with Anna for CBI is not under Govt. , Why not open the name of Black money account holder.
If govt. Support to public , why not open the name of black money person.
public is not happy with Sh. Soniya ji and Sh. Manmohan Singh ji coz Govt only fraud advertising & verbally support to public but actualy you are not support to indian public and Govt not support to Corrupution.
Only you time pass to find and search loose fault of Annaji and other person , Why you doing time pass for that, Why not work for public and black money, if you truely work for black money today all problem is solve.
Thanks
From:
S.K.Sadhu
Baroda.
State : Gujrat
My email add : tml_cml@yahoo.com
i want to made a membership of IAC. plz send me detail of registration.
Dear all
Joiin Anna Moement Use Anna card for Daily Messege by SMS .
If you more help Call me on 099049 00065 Kranti Vadodara
anna ji aap aage badho hum aapke sath hai
Me bi aana tu bi aana ab tho sara desh hai aana…
Bharat Mata ki jai………
ram
Anna Hazare I am with u in this battle……
brastachar ke khilaf agar ladna hai.to hume khud imandari se prayatna karana padega.
in rajnetao ke bharose to desh ka patanahi kaya hoga.jo desh hit se badkar apane hito ki parwa karte hai.agar hum sab milkar ye than le ki hum kewal usi umidwar ko vote dege jo imandar aur bedag ho.chahe wo nirdliye ho to majboor hokar political parties ko bhi aise hi umidwar ko tikit dena padega jo imandar aur swaksh chavi wala hoga.
mahesh agrawal
surat,ph 9328957776
brastachar ke khilaf agar ladna hai.to hume khud imandari se prayatna karana padega.
in rajnetao ke bharose to desh ka patanahi kaya hoga.jo desh hit se badkar apane hito ki parwa karte hai.agar hum sab milkar ye than le ki hum kewal usi umidwar ko vote dege jo imandar aur bedag ho.chahe wo nirdliye ho to majboor hokar political parties ko bhi aise hi umidwar ko tikit dena padega jo imandar aur swaksh chavi wala hoga.
Jay Bharat
Respected All,
I am dharmendra and i want to say something to the people of gujarat and people of india against “FIX PAY RULE FOR 5 YEARS & CONTRACTUAL JOB OF 11 MONTHS”.
In gujarat, state government recruit youths with a fix pay of 5 years & contractual job for 11 months. salary is very low for these job. when a NGO file PLI against the policy of state government, the state government says that they don’t have enough fund/money for full salary given to youth of gujarat and it will burden for state treasury while in other side, state government announce crores and crores of ruppees packages for different automobiles companies.
CRORES RUPPEES OF PACKAGES FOR BIG AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES ARE NOT BURDEN FOR STATE TREASURY AND SALARY IS A BURDEN FOR STATE GOVERNMENT ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Pleas organize some events and publicity of this matter in gujarat and in india and please convey my message to our honourable leader ANNA HAZARE.
JAY BHARAT
Jay Bharat
Respected All,
Hi Everyone,
I am totally in support of this “Andolan Against Bhrashtachar”. If we all want a corruption free India then we all have to support this andolan and also should have faith in this campaign,not only in Anna Hazare but in this cause. I also liked the thought “Main Anna Hoon” because we are not blindly following “Anna” but we are himself “Anna” cause we believe in corruption free India.
All for one, one for all.
Jai Hind
Dear Sir / Madam
Jai Hind
The reply to Parliament by Kejariwal about ‘breach of privilege notice’ is intelligent and legally tenable. But “India Against Corruption” should immediately start developing elaborate and institutionalized first, second third, forth, fifth, sixth and seventh line of leadership at national, state, sambhag, district, tehsil / taluka / metros, nagar / panchayat samities, gram / ward level respectively. Because Parliament / government may forcibly remove Kejariwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi by putting them in jail by taking excuse of these ‘Parliament privilege proceedings’ or otherwise on some other count. Hence in such eventuality another Anna agitation [which is bound to take place in next month due to ‘committee recommendation’ / Bill in Parliament and which is bound to dissatisfy Anna, Anna team and people of India] will suffer immensely if these leadership at said seven levels are not available throughout the country to take this resumed agitation to its logical and desired end (till desired Jan Lokpal Bill is passed by Parliament).
Yours truly
Hem Raj Jain
we want leader as anna hazare,kejrival,kiran bedi,prasant bhusan etc. who have clear image, transparent image,etc.we don’t want system.we don’t want rahul gandhi because what does he do for public?nothing, he does not do for public.public want persons in standing committee who listen about public.they support to public and what public want? finally power must not be in politics hands.power must be in public hand.we want freedom from corrupted politicians.we want p.m. who take strong decision in favor of public.our p.m. have lost trust from public.p.m. is unable to stop rising prize,corruption,misuse of power by politicians,etc.
Namaskar Anna G !!
Vande Mataram,
Aapne ek bar phir hum sabkp jaga diya hain gairhi neend se, “Jago O Sonewalo… kab tak anyay, adharma, paap, etc sehteh rahonge…. Agar hum sab HINDOOSTANI jag jay aur ek ho jaye aur apna nagrik adhikaro ke liye aawaz bulandh kare woh bhi shanti purna tarikhe se toh phir woh din door nahi saj yeh Bhrastachar ka CANCER aur yeh Bhrastachariyon ko sirf iss mulkah se nahin pritvi se humesa humesa ke liye baga sakthe hain.
10 BLUNDERS of Dr. Manmohan G:
1) 2G
2) 3G
3) CWG
4) Talking to Sardar G
(Montek Ahluwalia)
5) Listening to Rahul G
6) Replying to Advani G
7) Following Kapil Sibal G
8) Not listening to Pranab G
9) Forgetting ANNA & ANNA TEAM G
10) Desh ki JANTA ke Dard aur Taqleef se Bekabar G
Ab toh jag jao humare PRADHAN MANTRI G
Jai Hind!!
Thanks Annaji,
Soti Huyi Janata ko aapne jaga diya aur sabhi me deshprem jagga diya.
Vande Matram ,Bharat mata ki jay ke naro se sabhi ke khoon me garmi aa gayi.
Nayi generation aur poorani generation ke vichar mile is se dushmano( bharat ke ander aur bharat ke bahar ke)ko bhi pata chal gaya he ki anna ki awaj se sare bhartiya ek ho jayenege.
While we attempt for Lokpal, see what they have done of Lokayukta in Gujarat
Ahmedabad, 29 August, 2011
Following is a news story from http://Dailypioneer.Com authored by Shri Rathin Das
Former Justice BJ Sethna, who had resigned from high court following false allegations against him few years ago, has not only questioned the process leading to the controversial appointment but also hinted that Mehta is not as much a man of ‘integrity’ as he is touted to be by the State Congress leaders.
Sethna on Saturday said under provisions of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, it is the State Government which has to begin the process of naming the incumbent for the post.
Addressing a seminar on judicial accountability organized by the Gujarat chapter of the Indian Association of Lawyers (IAL), Sethna agreed that the Governor should appoint the Lokayukta in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition but said the process of recommendation of the names must begin from the Council of Ministers led by the Chief Minister.
Sethna questioned why the Opposition and the Chief Justice should insist only on one name and ignore other names short listed by the Council of Ministers.
The Chief Minister had sent a list of four names for consideration to the Chief Justice, said Sethna and asked why only one name was recommended to the Governor for appointment as the Lokayukta. “And why should the Opposition leader too insist on only one name?” asked Sethna.
He hinted that the Opposition is insisting on Mehta’s name because of his old Congress connections.
Sethna said Mehta, before being elevated as a judge in 1983, was a junior to veteran lawyer KK Vekhariya who is now the chief of the Congress legal cell in Gujarat.
Revealing the ‘other side’of the Lokayukta designate, Justice Sethna questioned Mehta’s moral authority to hold the position merely because anti-corruption crusader Anna Hazare had stayed with him during his visit here in May this year, a point projected by the state Congress as one of his ‘qualification’ for the high post.
Drawing parallel from Ramayana, Sethna said Mehta had done to his lawyer friend what Ravana had done to Ram. Mehta had an extra-marital affair for years with the wife of his lawyer friend and the duo finally got married only few years back, according to Sethna.
“How can a person of such ‘moral attitude’ be appointed to a high post like Lokayukta. He may not be corrupt for money, but what about moral behaviour?” asked Sethna.
There is something fishy about naming Justice Mehta for the post, he said and asked why only his name was recommended while there as many as 40 retired honourable High Court judges are available in Gujarat.
Sethna said that the Congress had rejected the name of former Justice KR Vyas as the Lokayukta between 2006 and 2009, but the same person was chosen as the Lokayukta in neighbouring Maharashtra.
“How can the retired judge unfit to be Lokayukta in Gujarat be fit enough for the same post in Congress-NCP ruled Maharashtra?” asked Sethna hinting that political mud slinging is dividing the legal fraternity.
He also pointed out that the Congress has found fault with the appointment of retired Supreme Court Justice MB Shah too to look into the 17 charges against the Gujarat Government under Chief Minister Narendra Modi. “The Congress leaders have forgotten that Justice Shah has an impeccable track record and has been chosen by the Supreme Court for the panel to track black money”, Justice Sethna said adding that it was wrong to call him a ‘puppet’of the Gujarat Government.
Recounting the hue and cry over his judgement upholding the acquittal of the 21 accused in the infamous Best Bakery case of Vadodara, Sethna said he was finally proved correct when the prime witness turned hostile and went back on her words several times.
All of Gujarat’s judiciary was criticised, he lamented and said that finally all realised that Zahira cannot be relied upon as witness and she was punished. Sethna said the judiciary reserves its ruling on many vital matters for long but speedily entertains any NGO filing petitions against Gujarat.
Gandhinagar, 29 August, 2011
Following is the state information department release on facts related to the entire Lokayukta controversy in the state. While it is fact that Gujarat had no Lokayukta for last 7.5 years, the details given below throw light on who was responsible for that – then Governor and the leader of opposition can not escape from being responsible for the delay.
Unconstitutional appointment of Lokayukta in Gujarat
Chronology of dates and events
S. No. Date Events
7.8.2006 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting with the Leader of Opposition in the Gujarat Legislative Assembly, to consult him on the subject of appointment of a suitable person as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
Hon’ble Chief Minister had suggested the name of Justice (Retired) Shri Kshitij R. Vyas and the Leader of Opposition suggested some other names. At the end of discussions, Hon’ble Chief Minister asked whether the Leader of Opposition had any specific objection against the name suggested by him. The Leader of Opposition specifically mentioned that he had no objection to the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister but he wanted that the names suggested by him should also be taken into consideration.
7.8.2006 A letter was sent to Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court as a part of consultation process to know his views on the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
8.8.2006 Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court conveyed his consent to the name suggested by the Hon’ble Chief Minister for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
10.8.2006 The file was sent to H.E. the Governor for appointment of Justice (Retired) Shri Kshitij R. Vyas as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
25.8.2006 H.E. the Governor desired that a copy of the minutes/ record of proceedings of the meeting held with the Leader of Opposition by the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 7.8.2006 may be furnished.
13.9.2006 A letter was received from the Raj Bhavan wherein, it was mentioned that H.E. the Governor desired to know the procedure adopted to fulfill the requirement of consultation with the Leader of Opposition and Hon’ble Chief Justice, etc. in the different States like Maharashtra, West Bengal, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and Tamil Nadu.
27.2.2007 The information as called for by H.E. the Governor vide his letter dated 13.9.2006 was sent. Such information was to be obtained from different States and hence it took some time in gathering the information.
6.2.2009 H.E. the Governor returned the file with some observations.
2.7.2009 The file was resubmitted to H.E. the Governor explaining as to how the provisions of section 24(3) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 do not come in the way of appointment of the person suggested by the Government for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
10. 10.9.2009 H.E. the Governor returned the file with the following observation:
“In view of sub-section (3) of section 6 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, since the person recommended by the Government has held the office of the Chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Maharashtra, the Government’s proposal for his appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State cannot be agreed to.”
11. 10.9.2009 The then H.E. the Governor sent a letter to Hon’ble Chief Minister mentioning that it was not possible to appoint Shri Kshitij R. Vyas as Lokayukta, Gujarat State in view of the clear provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
He also requested the Chief Minister to send a fresh proposal for appointment of Lokayukta after due consultation with the Chief Justice of the Gujarat high Court and the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly as per the provisions of section 3(1) of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986.
12. 8.2.2010 A confidential letter was sent by Hon’ble Chief Minister to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court requesting him to suggest a panel of three Retired Judges of the High Court of Gujarat as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
13. 24.2.2010 Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent the panel of four Retired Judges of High Court of Gujarat for consideration for appointment of Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
14. 2.3.2010 A letter was sent by Hon’ble Chief Minister to the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly to participate in the meeting at 11 am on 4.3.2010 as a part of consultation process for appointment of Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
15. 3.3.2010 The Leader of Opposition objected to such process of consultation being initiated by the Hon’ble Chief Minister. He also refused to join the consultation process with Hon’ble Chief Minister.
16. 3.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Leader of Opposition explaining the legal and Constitutional position obtaining in the matter and once again requested to remain present in the meeting of 4.3.2010.
17. 3.3.2010 A confidential letter dated 3.3.2010 was received from H.E. the Governor, wherein she inter alia mentioned that she had deemed it appropriate to initiate the matter of appointment of Lokayukta and had decided to hold consultation with the Leader of Opposition on 4.3.2010 at 10.30 a.m. in her office in Raj Bhavan, Gandhinagar.
18. 4.3.2010 The Leader of Opposition sent a letter saying that in the matter of appointment of a Lokayukta, the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers should not have any say. He also requested the Hon’ble Chief Minister to forthwith terminate the process of consultation initiated by him in the matter.
The Leader of Opposition also informed that H.E. the Governor had already initiated the process of consultation with the Leader of Opposition and a meeting for the purpose was to take place at 10.30 a.m. on 4.3.2010.
19. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Leader of Opposition once again requesting him to participate in the consultation process and to remain present in the meeting at 1 pm on 5.3.2010.
20. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to H.E. the Governor wherein, he mentioned that since certain legal and Constitutional issues have been raised in her letter dated 3.3.2010, he considers it necessary to have a discussion on the subject with her. Hon’ble Chief Minister sought suitable date and time for such discussion/ meeting with H.E. the Governor.
21. 4.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting as per the schedule at 11 am on 4.3.2010 as a part of consultation process. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present in the meeting.
22. 5.3.2010 A letter dated 4.3.2010 was received from the Leader of Opposition intimating that he had already participated in the consultation process at 10.30 am on 4.3.2010 with H.E. the Governor of Gujarat and in view of the consultation already held by H.E. the Governor of Gujarat, he regretted his inability and unwillingness to be present in the meeting to be held by Hon’ble Chief Minister at 1 pm on 5.3.2010.
23. 5.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held a meeting as per the schedule at 1 pm on 5.3.2010. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present.
24. 5.3.2010 A letter was received from the Principal Secretary to H.E. the Governor conveying that H.E. the Governor had given the time for the meeting with Hon’ble Chief Minister at 16.00 hrs. on 8.3.2010.
25. 8.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister along with the Hon’ble MoS (Law) called on H.E. the Governor and discussed the point at issue at length. Hon’ble Chief Minister also gave a folder containing all the relevant details pertaining to the issue and requested to resolve the issue at the earliest.
26. 18.3.2010 With a view to ensuring that the consultation process with the Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly takes place, Hon’ble Chief Minister sent one more letter to the Leader of Opposition intimating him that he (Hon’ble CM) proposed to hold meeting for consultation process at 11 am on 22.3.2010 (Monday). He also inter alia made it clear that it was for the last time that he was making a request to attend the meeting for consultation process in the matter. Hon’ble Chief Minister had also quoted all the relevant judgments of High Courts/ Supreme Court including the relevant and operative portion to emphasize the factual, legal and constitutional position obtaining in the matter.
27. 22.3.2010 A letter dated 22.3.2010 received from the Leader of Opposition wherein, he inter aliamentioned that he had already been called for the consultation process by H.E. the Governor on 4.3.2010; the said process was already over; there can never be consultation twice: once by Her Excellency the Governor and second by the Chief Minister and/ or the Council of Ministers.
At the end of the letter, the Leader of Opposition mentioned that Hon’ble Chief Minister should not persist in undertaking an exercise of consultation by him which lacks legal, moral and constitutional authority.
28. 22.3.2010 Hon’ble Chief Minister held the meeting as per the schedule at 11 am on 22.3.2010 in his office in Vidhan Sabha Complex. However, the Leader of Opposition did not remain present.
29. 31.3.2010 The name which was decided by the Hon’ble Chief Minister was placed before the Council of Ministers in the meeting of 31.3.2010. The Council of Ministers gave approval to the name.
30. 1.4.2010 The name which was approved by the Hon’ble Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers was sent to H.E. the Governor for obtaining approval.
31. 5.5.2010 The file was returned by H.E. the Governor with the observation that in terms of the recent judgment of the Apex court, the Chief Justice of the High Court is not required to send a panel of the names but he has to send only one name. Accordingly, H.E. the Governor has referred the whole matter back to the Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court requesting him to re-examine the matter once again.
32. 31.12.2010 The Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent the fresh proposal to the State Government recommending only one name for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State.
33. 21.2.2011 The Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat high Court explaining as to how the process of appointment of Lokayukta could be expedited by appointing the person whose name was recommended earlier by the Government to H.E. the Governor instead of considering a new name.
34. 22.3.2011 The Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court sent a letter to Hon’ble Chief Minister saying that he would again request the Government to consider the name recommended by him vide his letter dated 31.12.2010.
35. 1.5.2011 The person whose name was recommended by the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court vide his letter dated 31.12.2010 sent a Fax Message to H.E. the Governor requesting her to recall his nomination.
36. 4.5.2011 Hon’ble Chief Minister sent a letter to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court requesting him to recommend the name of the person in whose case the whole process of consideration had been gone through by the State Government for appointment as Lokayukta, Gujarat State. The matter is pending with the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court.
37. 7.6.2011 The Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court recommended another name.
38. 16.6.2011 Hon’ble Chief Minister wrote to the Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court quoting detailed reasons as to why the name recommended by the CJ was not acceptable.
39. 2.8.2011 Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court has sent a letter which was received by the State Government and the State Government, in turn, has addressed a letter dated 18.8.2011 to the Chief Justice reiterating its earlier stand and this letter is still under consideration of the Chief Justice.
40. 25.8.2011 Despite the aforesaid developments, to the utter shock and surprise of the State Government, the H.E. the Governor issued the warrant dated 25.8.2011 appointing Justice (Retd.) Mr. R. A. Mehta as Lokayukta, Gujarat State, the copy of which has been received along with a letter dated 25.8.2011 addressed to the Principal Secretary to the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 26.8.2011.
If CM has done nothing wrong then he should not worried from the appointment of any person at post of Lokaayukt on the contrary he should welcome the appointment so that all the blames of corruption on him can be inquired and if nothing will come out than his respect will enhance in
common people.
It is not a question or issue of worry. It is a point that simply because Nehruvian Congress is at center, its party is in opposition can dictate terms to Governor and the CM.
Namaste !
Shri Anna Hajare ji has created a History !! He should be rewarded with Nobel prize and BharatRatna Award !!!
Please recommend his name to Nobel Prize committee and India Government !!
If you agree – Kindly forward this message to all you know.
Dhanyawad
Rajesh
I have just registered as volanteer and i want some sticker of i-support, so please provide contact of parson in ahmedabad.
Most of the communities in the entire Indian sub-continent(such as Bengali) succumbed in ‘Culture of Poverty’(Oscar Lewis), irrespective of class or economic strata, lives in pavement or apartment. Nobody is genuinely regret ed or ashamed of the deep-rooted corruption, decaying general quality of life, worst Politico-administrative system, weak mother language, continuous consumption of common social space (mental as well as physical, both). We are becoming fathers & mothers only by self-procreation, mindlessly & blindfold(supported by some lame excuses). Simply depriving their(the children) fundamental rights of a decent, caring society, fearless & dignified living. Do not ever look for any other positive alternative behaviour(values) to perform human way of parenthood, i.e. deliberately co-parenting children those are born out of ignorance, extreme poverty. It seems that all of us are being driven only by the very animal instinct. If the Bengali people ever be able to bring that genuine freedom (from vicious cycle of ‘poverty’) in their own life/attitude, involve themselves in ‘Production of (social) Space’ (Henri Lefebvre), initiate a movement by heart, an intense attachment with the society at large is very much required – one different pathway has to create, decent & dedicated Politics will definitely come up. – Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, 16/4, Girish Banerjee Lane, Howrah-711101.
आधी लड़ाई जीत ली गई है और इसे एक पूरी जीत बनाने के लिए हमारा समर्थन जारी रहेगा
इस अभूतपूर्व उपलब्धि के अवसर को पूरे हर्षौल्लास से मनाने क लिए मोमबत्ती मार्च में शामिल हों
मोमबत्ती मार्च @ वस्त्रापुर
रविवार २८ अगस्त, शाम ६ बजे
गणपति मंदिर, वस्त्रापुर, अहमदाबाद
संपर्क : ८१२८३३२२८५
Half battle has been won and we will continue our support for making it a ‘complete victory’.
Join the celebration of this unprecedented achievement @Candle march@vastrapur,
Sunday(28th August), 6 pm
Ganpati mandir, Vastrapur
Contact: 8128332285
JAI HIND.
Dear Commarades,
I would like to know that is there any rally organised from Vastrapur lake,Ahmedabad.Gujarat. at 8:00 PM today ?
As i would like to join it.
BHARAT MATA KE JAI.
RIDHAM C PATEL
half battle has been won and we will continue our support for making it a ‘complete victory’.
Join the celebration of this unprecedented achievement @Candle march@vastrapur, Sunday, 6 pm, Ganpati mandir, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad
Respected Annaji,
Salute to your dedication & determination to eradicate corruption
from our country.
Your Andolan has created a great confidence in acommon man that
things can be changed for better even by his efforts
Falak lo zid hai jahan bijliyan girane ki
Hame bhi zid hai wahin Ashiyan banane ki.
LONG LIVE ANNAJI
We love and supports Annaji as same as our country. Dil diya hai Jan Bhi Dekhe Zaroor Denkhe for a beautiful India
Please like this page………n IACAhmedabad…..pls make this official page…..I am agree to assign u as an admin
https://www.facebook.com/pages/India-Against-Corruption-Ahmedabad-Gujarat/211817492200448
In 1982, In Singapore, LOKPAL BILL was implemented and 142 Corrupt Ministers & Officers were arrested in one single day. Today Singapore has only 1% poor people & no taxes are paid by the people to the government, 92% Literacy Rate, Better Medical Facilities, Cheaper Prices, 90% Money is white & Only 1% Unemployment exists. Re Post this if you want to live in a corruption free country.. !!
Now This has what got the government SCARED LIKE HELL…..
WE ARE ALWAYS WALK WITH YOU ANAAJI.
I can say one man know leading our country ….
One man who showing Duties of other peoples and our too…
He is not any politician or any Professional or NOT belongs from any party but he belongs from us…
So he is the Right person who can understand our problem and we have to support him …
Annaji, what ever you are doing that every bodies duty and every body should have to take action like you for our own county…
I am indian so i had taken my step BY SUPPORTING YOUR JANLOKBAL BILL ANDOLAN….
Have u did any thing for your country i m doing here and supporting to Anna’s Janlokbal bill….
I think it is every bodies duty to keep his or her own country clean from currupted people..
So support Annaji and …
VANDE MAATRAM………
JAI HIND AND JAY BHARAT…..
Dear Annaji
My heartest wishes to you and to your people for the sucessful movement.
if any point of time you my or any of the indian support we will be always with you.
vande matram
Great job guys .. carry on
Hi, Annaji,
Namashkar,
I Always Pray to God For Your Best Health. Me & My God is All Time With U. Thanks for Leadership to Our Country.
“Aap Aage Badho Pura Desh Aap ke Sath Hai”
Regards,
Dipak Solanki.
THANK YOU ANNA AS YOU ARE BANISHING CORRUPTION FROM OUR COUNTRY.GOD WILL BLESS YOU AS YOU ARE HELPING BILLIONS OF INDIANS.
LONG LIVE ANNA AND JAN LOKPAL
Hi,
I am an admin of this page https://www.facebook.com/pages/India-Against-Corruption-Ahmedabad-Gujarat/211817492200448
I would like to request you that if you have any news regarding protest in ahmedabad please send me an email on darshanv99@gmail.com
It would be good if you assign this page as an official page of IAC Ahmedabad.
Thanks